Threat For World : F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)

The F-35 is the result of the Defense Department's Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, which sought to build a multirole fighter optimized for the air-to-ground role with secondary air-to-air capability. The JSF requirement was to meet the needs of the Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and allies, with improved survivability, precision engagement capability, and reduced life cycle costs. By using many of the same technologies developed for the F-22, the F-35 has the opportunity to capitalize on commonality and modularity to maximize affordability.



















Additional systems on the F-35 include:

1. Northrup Grumman advanced electronically scanned array (AESA) multi-function radar
2. Snader/Litton Amecon electronic countermeasures equipment
3. Lockheed Martin electro-optical targeting system
4. Northrup Grumman distributed aperture infrared sensor (DAIRS) thermal imaging system
5. Vision Systems International advanced helmet-mounted display

F-35 Variants

US Air Force

The Air Force expects that to purchase 1763 F-35s to complement the F-22 Raptor and replace the F-16 as an air-toground strike aircraft. The Air Force variant includes an internal gun, infrared sensors, and laser designator. This is the technologically simplest version of the JSF, in that it does not require hover or aircraft carrier capability. Therefore it does not require the vertical thrust or the handling qualities for catapult launches, augmented control authority at landing approach speeds and strengthened structure to handle arrested landings. At the same time, the Air Force F-35 will have to improve upon the high standards created by the F-16. Since replacement of the F-16 by the F-35 will entail a significant payload reduction, the F-35 faces a very demanding one shot one kill requirement.

US Navy

The requirement for carrier operations creates the largest differences between the Air Force and Navy version. The naval version has larger wing and tail control surfaces to enable low-speed approaches to aircraft carriers. Leadingedge flaps and foldable wing tip sections account for this increased wing area. The larger wing area also provides the Navy version with an increased payload capability. To support the stresses of carrier landings and catapult launches, the internal structure of this version is strengthened. In addition, the landing gear has longer stroke and higher load capacity, and of course an arresting hook is added. Compared to the F-18C, the F-35 has twice the range on internal fuel.. The design is also optimized for survivability, which is a key Navy requirement. Like the USAF version, the Navy version will incorporate an internal gun and sensors. This new fighter will be used by the Navy as a first-day-of-war attack fighter in conjunction with the F/A-18 Hornet. The Navy plans to purchase 480 JSF.

US Marine Corps

The distinguishing feature of the USMC version of the JSF is its short takeoff/vertical landing capability (STOVL). There will not be an internally mounted machine gun, but an external gun can be fitted. This version requires controllability on all axes while hovering. Another critical design feature is its impact on the ground surface beneath it during hover. The USMC expects their version of the JSF will replace the F/A-18 Hornet and the AV-8 Harrier. The Marine Corps expects to purchase 480 STOVL versions of the F-35.

United Kingdom Royal Navy and Air Force

This version will be very similar to the one procured by the United States Marine Corps

Specifications
Function	strike fighter
Contractor	two competing teams: Lockheed-Martin Boeing
Service	U.S. Air Force	U.S. Marine Corps U.K. Royal Navy	U.S. Navy
Variants	Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL)	Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (STOVL)	Carrier-based (CV)
Unit Cost FY94$	$28M	$35M	$38M
Propulsion	Baseline: Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 derivative from F-22 Raptor Alternate Engine: General Electric F120 core
Thrust
Empty Weight	~22,500 lbs		~24,000 lbs
Internal Fuel	15,000 lbs		16,000 lbs
Payload	13,000 lbs		17,000 lbs
Maximum Takeoff Weight	~50,000 lbs
Length	45 feet
Wingspan	36 feet		30 feet
Height
Ceiling
Speed	supersonic
Combat Radius	over 600 nautical miles
Crew	one
Armament
First flight	1999
Date Deployed	2008
Inventory Objectives	U.S. Air Force 1,763 aircraft	U.S. Marine Corps 480 aircraft U.K. Royal Navy 60 aircraft	U.S. Navy 480 aircraft

Specifications

Why India Fail ?

Dear Friends

In this era of globalization it is very important that you perform a rational analysis of every aspect of your life so that your decision is accurate, justified and beneficial.

Same thing is applicable at country level. The best example is USA, Israel. What is their plus point is that they have a system which analyze scenarios in a full context and then take as well as implement those decisions.

What India Lacks:

1. India have no system to analyze scenarios in whole.
2. No one is responsible for his/her duty.
3. No one want to take decision because they avoid to take responsibility.
4. Every one try to throw ball in others court or just to pass other, no one try to make a goal.
5. No clear cut boundary between departments, same work was performed by several departments producing a controversy.
6. Every thing is seen as per politics.

Real Examples :

1. Increasing population of Bangladeshis :

It is going to be the most dangerous mistake by India but no one care. Because now they are useful to increase their seats.

2. Conversions specially by Christians :
The major cause for conflicts with Christians is forceful conversion.

3. Dividing India on issue of cast, state etc.
Gurzar Andolan, Raj Thakrey issue, Chhath Puja Issue

4. Utilizing cases for political benefits
Raj Thakrey Issue, Rahul Raj Murder, Ram Setu Issue, Batala House Encounter

Why Single Window:

Actually we have to view India as whole. All these issues raised above are crucial for India and require immediate action. But you will be able to take accurate action only when you are analyzing them in whole...............................