Who assassinated Benazir Bhutto?

Former prime minister Benazir Bhutto was attacked from three sides on December 27, 2007 in Rawalpindi. One of the assassins seen in the videos fired at her from the left side but the cause of her death was a wound on the right side of her head. Her vehicle was supposed to turn left towards Gawalmandi from the Liaquat Bagh but police blocked the road from the left side and her vehicle was forced to turn right after the public meeting and she was attacked immediately after taking the right turn.

These facts were revealed in a special investigative episode of Capital Talk on Geo News on Monday night. Hamid Mir conducted the investigations and interviewed all those who were present with Benazir Bhutto in her vehicle at the time of the attack. He also interviewed some key eyewitnesses who were injured in the attack.

Benazir Bhutto also wrote an email to an American journalist, Wolf Blitzer, on October 26, 2007 before her assassination, saying Musharraf should be held responsible if she was killed. Benazir was also aware of the dangers to her life, as the Interior Ministry had already informed her about the threats to her life on December 12, 2007. But in spite of all these threats, she continued her election campaign. She said on December 26, 2007 in a public gathering in Peshawar that life should be spent like a lion, not like a jackal.

The investigative feature of Geo was based on 12 questions:

1) Why did Benazir come out of the sunroof?

2) Why was there no sufficient security on her return from the Liaquat Bagh?

3) Why was her car turned right when it had to go left?

4) Was her death caused by the lever of the vehicle or a bullet?

5) Were the firing and blast triggered by one person?

6) Did more than one person fire at Benazir?

7) Why was her autopsy not done?

8) Who ordered to wash the crime scene immediately?

9) Which direction was she shot from — left or right?

10) Are the accused arrested in her murder case the real killers?

11) What did the government say in reply to the letter she wrote to General (retd) Musharraf, naming three persons who should be held responsible for her murder?

12) Why her last email to Wolf Blitzer was not made the basis of the investigations into her murder?

General Theory of Criminal Act:

There is one victim and one accused who got benefited by act. Here one thing is very surprising that Mr. Musharraf and Mr. Jardari (Two Ever Green Enemies ) are calm about each other. Mrs. Bhutto death was a great gift to Mr. Jardari and he got everything lost in last decade. Mr. Musharraf is safe and quietly passing his time. Both things are not possible if Mrs. Bhutto was not killed. She never tolerated her husband's evil.

Now Pakistan's future is most unsafe and Mr. Nawaj Sharif is only one person who can lead it in a positive

direction neither only KHUDA can save it.

Impact On India:

Benazir's assassination is a great loss for World because she have mandate to speak on behalf of Pakistan........

In above document one point is very crucial for India that now Terrorist are instructed to Generate revenue by means of Bank robbery.

If we consider the Increase in number of bank robberies in last 1 years then it signal that we have to interrogate these incidents in a new perspective.

Due to increase in security Terrorist are changing their strategies and now they are planning to use available natural resources. In this scenario Security of Banks ATM and Banks, Gas Cylinder filled trucks, of Petrol / Diesel Tankers.should be watched carefully.

Postmortem of India

Dear Friends

If we try to study Mumbai Incidents and the current Encounter in Mehar (Punch) then we can draw a conclusion that its a time to conduct a through and deep postmartum of Indian Intelligence system as well as defense system.

Base :

1. Mumbai attack was not a surprise, we have already information and some how most accurate information but we failed to act;-

* Refining this information.
* Protecting / Spying our sea.
* Spying Karachi Ports.
* We know that Taj and others are target but we have no map of these building.
* 10 Terrorist and 500 commandos bot still it had been taken 2-3 days. Means there is some problem in our security personal or in our policy makers.
* There was no command, only Mumbai crime branch have up to some extent.
* Terrorist have complete information regarding every movement of Security forces but there was no one to care about it.
* They are planned but we are unplanned.
* There should be our spy agents at Karachi and Mumbai beach and if not then why ?
* They carried a huge amount of weapons which was either preplanned or there was some one who helped to carry this.
* We are sure that few of their local helps were there and they escaped as victim.


2. For the last 3-4 days our army is fighting with terrorist in Mendhar (Poonch)

* It is a border area so what IB, MI and other agencies are doing.
* They have permanent concrete bunkers , it means it must be developed by local help.
* They are fighting for a long time so they must have huge amount of ammunition.

Why Postmortem :

1. If we analyze the period of Mumbai attack then we see that during this period (For Last 6 Months) RAW was busy in fighting its internal fight. Top officers have no time to look after their duties. They are just gossiping that who raped whom ?

2. IB is busy in astro speaks and just like a astrologist they are issue a monthly or weekly bulletin that terrorist attack is possible in this area. If it happened then they say we already informed but if not then they say we countered it.

3. MI (For Army, Navy and AF) they are covered with safety. Though Kargil or Mendhar is Totally their responcibility but who dare to ask. Top level is busy in their own politics and to make happy their political leaders so no one bother about country.

What To Do :

1. Define a clear cut policy and guidelines for each agency and put responsible for their act.

2. RAW should be thought a lesson that do not try to be ISI or CIA for India who try to govern the system of Government. They should be responsible for their duties (Management and Top Level) and it should not be treated a Milky cow in the name of Secrecy and security. Because the actual root level people oftenlly get a very small piece of chiken and rest is distributed between top level officers or Mediators.

2. Mostly IB is fighting with RAW to take credit and pass responsibility. A clear distinction should be identified and a lesson should thought that both are for India.

3. MI (For Army, Navy and AF) should not be sheltered in name of security. Kargil is a clear responsibility of Army and its Intelligence. For Mumbai how we can clean chit Navy and coat guard.

NIA :

NIA is equivalent to DIA of USA and not to FBI as people understand. Its main task will be Investigative not Intelligence.

In USA there was a central command in the chairmanship of President and all the agencies have a clear heirarchy and they always follow it. CIA is Presidents eye for External World and all the concern agencies are aware of each other.

In India same task was performed by different agencies and mostlly they copy each other making a little bit of change.

What Really India Needs:

Actuall India have to work on 3 Core modules :

1. Input : RAW, IB, MI, All Other departments having their own Intelligence system, States Intelligence Departments ( A Village level system is to be developed )

2. Output : Actual action should be executed by them- NSG, Central Forces, CBI, State Police SOG (This area need a deep make over )

3. Processing : This system is to be constructed.

Note : All these 3 areas need a deep and modern make over which could not be disclosed here. But if you have any suggession then plase send.